"Unconstitutional and Undemocratic": Falana Slams Compulsory Voting Bill

Renowned human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, has delivered a scathing critique of the controversial Compulsory Voting Bill currently before the National Assembly, declaring it fundamentally unconstitutional and an affront to democratic principles.

Speaking at a recent public forum on electoral reforms in Lagos, Falana articulated why the proposed legislation, which would make voting mandatory for all eligible Nigerians with penalties for non-compliance, contradicts the very essence of Nigeria's constitutional democracy.

"What makes a democracy functional is not forced participation but the freedom to choose whether to participate," Falana emphasized. "The right to vote inherently includes the right not to vote, and any attempt to criminalize non-participation fundamentally misunderstands the nature of democratic rights."

The senior lawyer meticulously outlined several constitutional provisions that would be violated by the proposed bill, particularly highlighting sections that guarantee citizens' fundamental rights to freedom of expression, association, and personal liberty.

Legal experts following the debate note that Falana's intervention carries significant weight given his track record of constitutional litigation and advocacy for electoral reforms. His position adds a powerful voice to the growing opposition against the bill, which has already faced criticism from civil society organizations and political analysts.

Proponents of the bill have argued that compulsory voting would increase electoral participation and strengthen Nigeria's democracy. However, Falana countered this perspective, noting that authentic democratic engagement requires addressing the root causes of voter apathy rather than imposing penalties.

"When citizens abstain from voting, they are communicating something important about our political system," he explained. "The answer isn't to force them to the polls under threat of punishment but to create a political environment that makes voting meaningful."

As the National Assembly continues deliberations on this contentious legislation, Falana's constitutional arguments have provided substantial legal ammunition for those opposing the bill, potentially setting the stage for a constitutional challenge should it progress toward becoming law.

---

Do you support or oppose compulsory voting in Nigeria? What do you think would better improve electoral participation? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Stay informed on legal and political developments by subscribing to our newsletter and following us on our social handle @OneNaijaBoyNG for timely updates and analysis.